Controversy and Considerable Debate: Pennant Universitys Devotion to Political Proposals Questioned by President Hutchins and Sarkees in Counties

Controversy and Considerable Debate: Pennant Universitys Devotion to Political Proposals Questioned by President Hutchins and Sarkees in Counties

Abstract

This article explores the controversy surrounding Pennant University's involvement in political proposals, which has been called into question by President Hutchins and Sarkees in counties. The article reviews the history of Pennant University's political activity, tracing its development from a small group of students concerned with social justice issues to a major force in local and national politics. It also examines the arguments made by President Hutchins and Sarkees, who argue that the university's political involvement is inappropriate, interferes with academic pursuits, and could compromise the university's position as an unbiased provider of education. The article then considers the responses to these criticisms, with some arguing that Pennant University's political activity is a legitimate form of social engagement and others claiming that it is a dangerous distraction from academic pursuits. Ultimately, the article concludes that the controversy surrounding Pennant University's political activity is an important issue that deserves careful consideration by scholars, policymakers, and the public at large.

Citation

Matthew Christoph "Controversy and Considerable Debate: Pennant Universitys Devotion to Political Proposals Questioned by President Hutchins and Sarkees in Counties".  IEEE Exploration in Machine Learning, 2019.

Supplemental Material

Preview

Note: This file is about ~5-30 MB in size.

This paper appears in:
Date of Release: 2019
Author(s): Matthew Christoph.
IEEE Exploration in Machine Learning
Page(s): 8
Product Type: Conference/Journal Publications